comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » vn5.4 woes (today missing)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: vn5.4 woes (today missing) [message #23160 is a reply to message #23118] Mon, 08 January 2001 02:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wmconnolley is currently offline  wmconnolley
Messages: 106
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
William Daffer <whdaffer@earthlink.net> wrote:
> "Mark Hadfield" <m.hadfield@niwa.cri.nz> writes:

>> The lack of Y2K conpatibility lay in the fact that ONE of the routines (I
>> forget the name)

> str_to_dt.pro, I believe.


>> would accept 2-digit years and do something not very smart
>> with them. The routine also accepted 4-digit years so people prescient
>> enough to use them would never have noticed a problem.
>>
>> Pulling the IDLDT stuff was a lawyer-driven panic.

> I agree. I pulled them out of idl 5.2 and use them daily in all of
> my processing at work. If you use 4 digits, there's *absolutely* no
> problem!

OK, thanks for the reassurance, I'll continue to do the same...

-W.

--
William M Connolley | wmc@bas.ac.uk | http://www.nerc-bas.ac.uk/icd/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | Disclaimer: I speak for myself
I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file & help me spread!
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Which like command for IDL?
Next Topic: Code for Dynamically creating and repositioning Buttons during IDL runtime

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 22:08:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80291 seconds