comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: check for duplicate routine names?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: check for duplicate routine names? [message #23260 is a reply to message #23259] Fri, 19 January 2001 06:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
davidf is currently offline  davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
Senior Member
David Fanning (davidf@dfanning.com) writes:
>
> What you need is a language with a little more
> structure to it. Why not give up IDL and try
> Pascal. :-)

Whoops! Michael, that maybe came across harder than I
intended. And I'm already fearing another "rude" message
from Rochelle. :-(

What I was trying to say is that IDL is a "loose" sort
of language. That gives us fits sometimes, but it is
also what gives us so much power. Yes, IDL could be
doing all kinds of checking of all kinds of things.
It would be substantially slower, substantially less
powerful, and probably cost substantially more. And
it would be a hell of a lot less fun to work with.

You will smack your head a couple or three times.
But even the dullest of us (I speak here from
experience) eventually learn to duck. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL and basic stable! widgets [Example program??]
Next Topic: Re: Printf and line breaks

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 02:38:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.20250 seconds