comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL opinions

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL opinions [message #2345 is a reply to message #2153]

Tue, 07 June 1994 23:07

stl
Messages: 70
Registered: February 1994

Member

In article <7JUN199412145303@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov> isaacman@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov (Subvert the Dominant Paradigm! (301) 513-7769) writes:
>
> I agree with Bill's post. However, I would add the caveat that one area
> in which IDL has problems is memory management. You can get bitten by
> memory fragmentation if you are manipulating many large arrays.
>
> Rich Isaacman

Someone else mentioned, this, but it cannot be said enough. IDL handles
memory very well, and fragmentation is more a result from the operating
system. If you are really using huge data sets, using assoc() may help
your problem (since it uses no memory space (theoretically) and is
bloody fast. Like any other language (okay, most) you just have to do
some memory masnagement in your code. Not a big deal, and I would
venture to say that it is MUCH easier in IDL then most languages!

-stephen Strebel

--
Stephen C Strebel / SKI TO DIE
strebel@sma.ch / and
Swiss Meteorological Institute, Zuerich / LIVE TO TELL ABOUT IT
01 256 93 85 / (and pray for snow)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL opinions By: isaacman on Tue, 07 June 1994 09:14
		Re: IDL opinions By: thompson on Tue, 07 June 1994 07:37
		Re: IDL opinions By: dan on Tue, 07 June 1994 14:51
		Re: IDL opinions By: stl on Tue, 07 June 1994 23:07

Previous Topic:	Re: Accessing an element of an array operation
Next Topic:	Re: IDL's error messages

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 16 01:43:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55950 seconds