comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Back to idl after a looong time...
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Back to idl after a looong time... [message #23585 is a reply to message #23394] Tue, 30 January 2001 04:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Alex Schuster is currently offline  Alex Schuster
Messages: 124
Registered: February 1997
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:

> Alex Schuster (alex@pet.mpin-koeln.mpg.de) writes:
>
>> Okay-okay, looks like some people really like it. I had tried it,
>> but was disappointed and continued using the command line version. I
>> must admit that I first hadn't figured out that I could have multiple
>> edit windows outside the development environment, that was the biggest
>> drawback. Am I right that this is still the case in the Windows
>> version?
>
> As far as I know there is no limit to the number of edit windows
> you can have open in the IDLDE. At least, I've never run up
> against a *practical* limit, and I've had lots and lots open
> at once. :-)

That�s right, but I meant windows OUTSIDE the IDLDE. I just do not like
to have a big window inside of which all my edit windows reside. Under
Unix, I can place these windows outside the IDLSE if I want, anywhere on
the screen. In Windows, I can at least place all info windows like the
variable watch or the command line outside the main window, but not the
edit windows. I�d prefer to have it the other way around. And, maybe, if
I had noticed from the beginning that this limit wasn�t in the Unix
version, I might have used it more frequently. But maybe not, I miss
features like saving all windows on exit, so I don�t have to reload them
after exiting IDL. You know, in these days before .RESET_SESSION, which
my IDL doesn�t know about yet.


>> There are some nice features like the variable
>> watch, but yes, David, I'm just fine with print
>> statements for debugging. Am I too old-fashioned here?
>
> I'm getting better with the debugger (and of course
> it is wonderful and works great), but for the quick
> look I confess I still use Print statements, too. :-)

And that without noticing the existence of .SKIP.

Alex
--
Alex Schuster Wonko@weird.cologne.de PGP Key available
alex@pet.mpin-koeln.mpg.de
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL listbox
Next Topic: Re: VRML file importer?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 22:21:39 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56182 seconds