comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: JULDAY 5.4 not same as 5.3?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: JULDAY 5.4 not same as 5.3? [message #23982 is a reply to message #23978] Fri, 02 March 2001 02:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
pertti is currently offline  pertti
Messages: 2
Registered: January 2001
Junior Member
Don Woodraska (don.woodraska@lasp.colorado.edu) wrote:
: I should have included this in the original post:
:
: IDL> print,!version
: { sparc sunos unix 5.4 Sep 25 2000 64 64}
:
: Thanks for your response Mark. I'll bet it must be a 64-bit-only bug.
: Can anyone else verify this bug on another 64-bit machine?

Mhhh...

IDL> umm=2l & udd=16l & uyear=2001l
IDL> uhr=0l & umin=0l & usec=0l
IDL> in_jday = julday( umm, udd, uyear, uhr, umin, usec )
IDL> help,in_jday
IN_JDAY DOUBLE = 2451956.5
IDL> print,!version
{ sparc sunos unix 5.4 Sep 25 2000 32 64}
IDL> $uname -a
SunOS sun4 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
IDL> $/bin/isainfo -b
64

According to IDL Online Help, there are two versions of IDL 5.4 for
Solaris, 64-bit and 32-bit memory support. We have 64-bit
kernel (Solaris 8), but still seem to use 32-bit memory support (if I
understand correctly the contents of !version system variable). If you
have both 64-bit and 32-bit versions installed, it should be possible
to start IDl in 32-bit mode by giving option -32.

Pertti
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Clsuter analysis wiht IDL
Next Topic: Re: Communication between different widget bases

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:15:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96082 seconds