comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: REDUCE

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: REDUCE [message #24508 is a reply to message #24378]

Tue, 03 April 2001 01:08

Martin Schultz
Messages: 515
Registered: August 1997

Senior Member

JD Smith wrote:
>
> ... Unfortunately, this implements, albeit in a
> more manageable and less ugly way, pretty much what I'd already
> accomplished with macros. That is, each and every of the functions
> BYTE_foo, INT_foo, ULONG_foo, etc., get compiled and included in the
> executeable separately, and you essentially choose among them with the
> run-time type information. This works, but leads to extreme code bloat
> if you're replicating a large function 10's of times.

Unless RSI has a Wonderland solution, they probably do the same.
Just a "reverse" idea: Looking at one of your recent examples, it
seemed as if all the code but the definition of the out array was type
independent. So, why not put that code in a macro? Something like

if(maxQ) {switch( type ) {
case IDL_TYP_BYTE:
{
UCHAR *tin,*tout,tmp;
tout=( UCHAR *)out;
tin=( UCHAR *)arg[0]->value.arr->data;
#include max_fun.h
}
}
break;
case IDL_TYP_INT:
{
short *tin,*tout,tmp;
tout=( short *)out;
tin =( short *)arg[0]->value.arr->data ;
#include max_fun.h
}
}
break;
...

Doesn't solve the problem but may make the code easier to read and
maintain (just imagine you want to fix a bug in 10 copies of almost
the same code)

Cheers,

Martin

--
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[[ Dr. Martin Schultz Max-Planck-Institut fuer Meteorologie [[
[[ Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg [[
[[ phone: +49 40 41173-308 [[
[[ fax: +49 40 41173-298 [[
[[ martin.schultz@dkrz.de [[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: REDUCE By: John-David T. Smith on Mon, 02 April 2001 11:17
		Re: REDUCE By: Richard Younger on Sun, 01 April 2001 20:31
		Re: REDUCE By: John-David T. Smith on Sun, 01 April 2001 15:01
		Re: REDUCE By: Richard Younger on Sun, 01 April 2001 11:55
		Re: REDUCE By: Kenneth Mankoff on Thu, 29 March 2001 23:30
		Re: REDUCE By: John-David T. Smith on Thu, 29 March 2001 21:32
		Re: REDUCE By: Kenneth Mankoff on Thu, 29 March 2001 17:52
		Re: REDUCE By: Martin Schultz on Tue, 03 April 2001 01:08

Previous Topic:	Re: Execution halted
Next Topic:	wavelet

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 01 02:10:43 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05320 seconds