comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: something like perl's 'require 5.4'
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: something like perl's 'require 5.4' [message #24690 is a reply to message #24689] Tue, 17 April 2001 14:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
thompson is currently offline  thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
Senior Member
Craig Markwardt <craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu> writes:


> Vapuser <vapuser@catspaw.jpl.nasa.gov> writes:
>> How about:
>>
>> version=strupcase(strjoin(strsplit(!version.release,'[.-_]', /extract), ""))
>> input_version=strupcase(strjoin(strsplit(desired_release,'[. -_]',/extract), ""))
>> if version lt input_version then 'eeek'
>>
>> Clearly `desired_release' would have to be input as a string.
>>
>> Of couse, this method 'requires' IDL 5.3 (IIRC), to get the regular
>> expression semantics of strsplit. The other question is will RSI use
>> any separator in version designations besides these three?


> Umm, I never thought I'd be saying this, but aren't these a bit
> overengineered? I have found that in 95% of the cases the DOUBLE
> compare will work, and in 4% of the cases the STRING compare will
> work.

I've always found that a simple string comparison works in 100% of the cases.
Where doesn't it work?

Bill Thompson
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: OVERLAYING IMAGES
Next Topic: reading file into structure?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:15:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.83675 seconds