comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: FOR statement

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: FOR statement [message #24753 is a reply to message #24752]

Thu, 12 April 2001 09:15

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

"Liam E. Gumley" wrote:
> Try this instead:
>
> nx = 1000 ; number of values required

What I meant to say was

nx = 401

but the rest of my post still applies.

Cheers,
Liam.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: FOR statement By: Eli Beckerman on Fri, 13 April 2001 13:17
		Re: FOR statement By: Liam E. Gumley on Thu, 12 April 2001 14:04
		Re: FOR statement By: Eli Beckerman on Thu, 12 April 2001 12:41
		Re: FOR statement By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 12 April 2001 09:18
		Re: FOR statement By: Liam E. Gumley on Thu, 12 April 2001 09:15
		Re: FOR statement By: Liam E. Gumley on Thu, 12 April 2001 09:12
		Re: FOR statement By: Paul van Delst on Thu, 12 April 2001 08:57
		Re: FOR statement By: John-David T. Smith on Thu, 12 April 2001 09:04

Previous Topic:	Re: MAKE_ARRAY question
Next Topic:	IDLgrWindow, Map_Patch, and contours

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:43:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36155 seconds