comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL and Beowolf ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL and Beowolf ? [message #25920 is a reply to message #25829]

Mon, 23 July 2001 19:10

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

david@dfanning.com (David Fanning) writes:
> Time to upgrade from IDL 4.0, Craig? :-)

I already use IDL 5.2 and 5.3, thank you very much. :-) I stick with
the old notation and avoid new features, because "why break what's
already fixed?"

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL and Beowolf ? By: dmarshall on Mon, 23 July 2001 09:08
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: Craig Markwardt on Mon, 23 July 2001 19:10
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: ronn on Mon, 23 July 2001 15:06
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: nobody@nowhere.com (S on Thu, 02 August 2001 09:40
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: Axel Schweiger on Fri, 03 August 2001 10:06
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: nobody@nowhere.com (S on Thu, 02 August 2001 09:36
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: bruhwile on Thu, 02 August 2001 20:20
		Re: IDL and Beowolf ? By: bruhwile on Tue, 31 July 2001 12:53

Previous Topic:	matching fields in ascii or text files.
Next Topic:	Re: taming the shrew, a.k.a. structure

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:22:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80026 seconds