comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Testers needed for TV benchmark
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Testers needed for TV benchmark [message #26137 is a reply to message #26135] Wed, 08 August 2001 13:55 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
billb is currently offline  billb
Messages: 5
Registered: August 2001
Junior Member
"Liam E. Gumley" <Liam.Gumley@ssec.wisc.edu> wrote in message news:<3B7183C6.4D1A3622@ssec.wisc.edu>...

> To obtain the best frame rate for animations, first you should display
> all the images in a pixmap window, and *then* use DEVICE, COPY to copy
> each image to a visible graphics window. I'm willing to bet you'll get
> frame rates better than 10 frames/sec using this method.
>

Hi Liam,

If you look at my benchmark, that is the 1st of the two tests being
executed:

<snip>

FOR I = 0, 49 DO BEGIN
WSET, pixmap0_id
TV, data, true = 3
WSET, pixmap1_id
DEVICE, COPY = [0, 0, sz-1, sz-1, 0, 0, pixmap0_id]
ENDFOR

<snip>

Also, the results I posted show no difference between the technique
that you describe and just TVing directly to the visible window. Ten
fps at 512*512 would be great but I see no indication that I can
achieve that on a PC. BTW, this benchmarking is in preparation for
what will be the SW end of a generic (any format) video frame grabber.
Could you verify if the snippet above is what you had in mind?

Thanks a bunch,
Bill
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: FFT's and images: or My 4th day on what I thought would take me only 6hrs
Next Topic: openr keyword conflict

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 14:43:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64185 seconds