comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » User selectable lower array bound?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: User selectable lower array bound? [message #26147 is a reply to message #25981] Wed, 08 August 2001 04:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Martin Schultz is currently offline  Martin Schultz
Messages: 515
Registered: August 1997
Senior Member
Craig Markwardt <craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu> writes:
> JD Smith <jdsmith@astro.cornell.edu> writes:
>> The most annoying thing about IDL arrays to me is the need always to
>> test whether they exist or not when concatenating onto them. The idea
>> of extending arrays in both directions would be neatly summed up by
>> allowing:
>>
>> a= & a= even if a doesn't (yet) exist.
>>
>> Either that, or IDL needs a list type which allows such operations.
>> Wasn't that just me ranting about special case functionality leading to
>> inconsistency?
>
> Hmmm, agreed. I think WMC's and my proposal was for a "null" data
> type which was essentially an empty list.
>
> Craig

as in
var = nularr(100) ;-)

what is N_Elements(nul_variable) ? How do you test for a keyword etc.?

Cheers,

Martin


--
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[[ Dr. Martin Schultz Max-Planck-Institut fuer Meteorologie [[
[[ Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg [[
[[ phone: +49 40 41173-308 [[
[[ fax: +49 40 41173-298 [[
[[ martin.schultz@dkrz.de [[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL virtual reality (was 3D Object IDL )
Next Topic: problem getting values from cw_bgroup normal base

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:39:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00496 seconds