comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? [message #26498 is a reply to message #26497] Wed, 05 September 2001 12:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mvukovic is currently offline  mvukovic
Messages: 63
Registered: July 1998
Member
David Fanning <david@dfanning.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.15ffce623d91ea6989694@news.frii.com>...
> Olaf Stetzer (olaf.stetzer@imk.fzk.de) writes:
>
>> I know that Object Oriented Programming is supported
>> in IDL but I wonder how far this concept is supported?
>
> Almost never as far as you would have hoped if
> you know much about real object-oriented programming.
> Remember, objects were graphed onto a language
> that was nearly 20 years old at the time.
>
stuff deleted...

With all due respect to David and RSI, I am wondering how valid this
argument in defense of RSI is. So, shooting off the hip:

It seems that a 50 year old language is going object these days
(fortran).

Yes, RSI will have a problem improving IDL if they keep to the old
core. Are we supposed to keep working with that old and tired
language? Will RSI get new users with such an outdated product?
Unless RSI works actively on rejuveniting IDL, they will loose out.

As a side-note, IDL was written in fortran 20 years ago, and
re-written in C some 10 years ago.

feeling much better :-), and expecting corrections to the arguments
above,

Mirko
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: cmyk colorcoded postscript file
Next Topic: Is there any "Dataminer" out there?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:51:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00377 seconds