comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? [message #26501 is a reply to message #26498]

Wed, 05 September 2001 08:47

mvukovic
Messages: 63
Registered: July 1998

Member

Olaf Stetzer <olaf.stetzer@imk.fzk.de> wrote in message news:<3B95D216.8F7BD6C1@imk.fzk.de>...
> Hello,
>
> I know that Object Oriented Programming is supported
> in IDL but I wonder how far this concept is supported?
>
> I am thinking of operator overloading in special. My
> Idea is the following:
>
stuff deleted

Operator overloading is not supported. Neither are friends, or
abstract objects.

As recently pointed out, you can cludge abstract objects by having the
INIT function return 0 and calling it from a derived object.

Mirko

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: mvukovic on Thu, 06 September 2001 11:16
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: Paul van Delst on Wed, 05 September 2001 13:54
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: David Fanning on Wed, 05 September 2001 13:23
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: mvukovic on Wed, 05 September 2001 12:47
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: mvukovic on Wed, 05 September 2001 08:47
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: David Fanning on Wed, 05 September 2001 05:54
		Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? By: Randall Skelton on Fri, 07 September 2001 04:08

Previous Topic:	cmyk colorcoded postscript file
Next Topic:	Is there any "Dataminer" out there?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:52:01 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00385 seconds