comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Is ANA dead?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Is ANA dead? [message #27258 is a reply to message #27181]

Sat, 13 October 2001 12:17

pit
Messages: 92
Registered: January 1996

Member

Amara Graps <Amara.Graps@mpi-hd.mpg.de> writes:
> Aaron Birenboim wrote:
>>
>> Is ANA dead? (It is/was a free alternative to IDL)
>> The Lockheed WWW sites seem to have dropped it.
>
> One of the authors of ANA is Louis Strous. Maybe ask him?
> (Search in Google) I don't know if he is still at Lockheed.

No, he's not. He went back to the Netherlands, and left solar physics :-(

Pit

--
Dr. Peter "Pit" Suetterlin http://www.astro.uu.nl/~suetter
Sterrenkundig Instituut Utrecht
Tel.: +31 (0)30 253 5225 P.Suetterlin@astro.uu.nl

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Is ANA dead? By: Aaron Birenboim on Fri, 12 October 2001 09:38
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: James Tappin on Mon, 15 October 2001 03:51
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: hcp on Thu, 18 October 2001 02:17
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: pit on Sat, 13 October 2001 12:17
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: Amara Graps on Sat, 13 October 2001 06:07

Previous Topic:	Re: bug in contour?
Next Topic:	Re: Time series with 75% missing observations

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 00:18:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56190 seconds