comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Is ANA dead?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Is ANA dead? [message #27266 is a reply to message #27181]

Sat, 13 October 2001 06:07

Amara Graps
Messages: 24
Registered: June 1996

Junior Member

Aaron Birenboim wrote:
>
> Is ANA dead? (It is/was a free alternative to IDL)
> The Lockheed WWW sites seem to have dropped it.

One of the authors of ANA is Louis Strous. Maybe ask him?
(Search in Google) I don't know if he is still at Lockheed.

Amara

--

************************************************************ ********
Amara Graps, PhD | Max-Planck-Institut fuer Kernphysik
Heidelberg Cosmic Dust Group | Saupfercheckweg 1
+49-6221-516-543 | 69117 Heidelberg, GERMANY
http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/dustgroup/~graps
************************************************************ ********
"Never fight an inanimate object." - P. J. O'Rourke

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Is ANA dead? By: Aaron Birenboim on Fri, 12 October 2001 09:38
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: James Tappin on Mon, 15 October 2001 03:51
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: hcp on Thu, 18 October 2001 02:17
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: pit on Sat, 13 October 2001 12:17
		Re: Is ANA dead? By: Amara Graps on Sat, 13 October 2001 06:07

Previous Topic:	Re: bug in contour?
Next Topic:	Re: Time series with 75% missing observations

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 19:24:43 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.20162 seconds