comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » will RSI support HDF5?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: will RSI support HDF5? [message #27464 is a reply to message #26527] Tue, 23 October 2001 03:02 Go to previous message
Phillip David is currently offline  Phillip David
Messages: 36
Registered: April 1999
Member
H C Pumphrey wrote:
> Let's just spell that out again in words of one syllable:
> HDF5 is NOT the next version of HDF4.[1] Apart from the facts that
> they are both file formats for storing large wads of scientific data,
> and
> that they both come from NCSA, they are totally and utterly different
> things.
>
> Struan Gray spake thusly:
>> My impression is that RSI is more interested in servicing its few
>> large customers than using people like me to kick-start interest in
>> IDL among new users. So be it.
>
> Now, NASA's EOS program is (a) a Large IDL customer, and (b) is
> actively switching from HDF4 to HDF5. Do I have to go on?

RSI has given us the impression that XonTech IS a large customer (we
have something like 40 licenses to IDL; most are for Windows, but a
few are for Macs. We're porting things over to Linux for some of our
codes, and really need HDF5 support NOW. We've been asking for the
last ... let's see ... about 2 years to get this. So apparently,
being a big customer isn't enough. Telling them that it's important
didn't do it either. We keep hearing "In version 6, we'll have HDF5
support", but then we keep getting more version 5 releases instead.

Now, with the dropping of plans for supporting Mac OSX and Alpha, and
the future of other Unix platforms possibly hanging in the balance,
we're going to have to look seriously at other options available to
us.

Currently, one of the most promising for our work is VisAD. This is
a client/server tool written in Java that currently supports HDF5,
and would work well to assist us with visualizing our data from a
central data facility without needing to transfer all of the data
across our internet lines. Instead, we'd just transfer over the
actual images. And Java's been optimized to do that very
efficiently.

It sounds like we're not the only ones looking into alternatives
to IDL, and I'm betting that RSI's recent announcements are only
going to speed the demise of sales they're experiencing.

I hope I'm wrong.

Phillip
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Sparse support
Next Topic: Sparse support

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:37:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00423 seconds