comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file [message #27744 is a reply to message #27740]

Thu, 01 November 2001 09:00

Martin Downing
Messages: 136
Registered: September 1998

Senior Member

Glad you didnt look too carefully, as the test file I sent was wrong
nyway - thought I had sent it *before* I started changing things, woops :(
I noticed though that the Keyword had been converted to a string on your
version.

The correct file is now on my web site, sorry - clearly not enough coffee
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/martin.downing/idl/test_ref_ext ra_bug.pro
code below:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/martin.downing/idl/test_ref_ext ra_bug2.pro
the below test though is *maybe* easier to follow

Martin

;=====================================================
; demonstrates _REF_EXTRA 's keyword argument passing anomalies

; main test procedure
pro test_ref_extra_bug2, debug=debug
; set debug to give help output of passes extra parameters
test_extra0, /key, debug=debug
test_ref_extra2, /key, debug=debug
; THIS ONE MAY CRASH YOUR IDL SESSION
test_ref_extra1, /key, debug=debug
end

pro test_extra0, debug=debug,_EXTRA=e
print, "TEST_EXTRA0"
if keyword_set(debug) then help,e,/st
test_ref_extra1, debug=debug,_REF_EXTRA=e
end

pro test_ref_extra1, debug=debug,_REF_EXTRA=e
print, "TEST_REF_EXTRA1"
if keyword_set(debug) then help,e,/str; & if defined(e) then print, e
test_ref_extra2,debug=debug, _REF_EXTRA=e
end
pro test_ref_extra2, debug=debug,_REF_EXTRA=e
print, "TEST_REF_EXTRA2"
if keyword_set(debug) then help,e,/st ;& if defined(e) then print, e
test_extra1, _EXTRA=e
end

; the final call
pro test_extra1,key1=key1, debug=debug,_EXTRA=e
print, "TEST_EXTRA1"
if keyword_set(debug) then help,e,/st
if keyword_set(KEY1) then print, "KEY1 set - good!" else Print, "KEY1
unset"
end

===============================

Martin

>
> I haven't looked closely at this, but here are my results
> on linux idl v5.5:
>
> IDL> test_ref_extra_bug
> { x86 linux unix linux 5.5 Aug 28 2001 32 32}
> ;calling: test_extra, 3, /Key1
> TEST_EXTRA
> ** Structure <827ebdc>, 1 tags, length=2, data length=2, refs=1:
> KEY1 INT 1
> { 1}
> ;calling: test_ref_extra, 2, /Key1
> pro test_ref_ex,call, _REF_EXTRA=e
> E STRING = Array[1]
> pro test_ex,call, _EXTRA=e
> ** Structure <827ebdc>, 1 tags, length=2, data length=2, refs=1:
> KEY1 INT 1
> pro test_ref_ex,call, _REF_EXTRA=e
> ** Structure <827ebdc>, 1 tags, length=2, data length=2, refs=1:
> KEY1 INT 1
>
>
> Cheers,
> bob
>

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Mark Hadfield on Sun, 04 November 2001 12:54
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: John-David T. Smith on Fri, 02 November 2001 12:06
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Martin Downing on Fri, 02 November 2001 01:59
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Mark Hadfield on Thu, 01 November 2001 16:18
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Martin Downing on Thu, 01 November 2001 15:30
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Mark Hadfield on Thu, 01 November 2001 12:28
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: John-David T. Smith on Thu, 01 November 2001 12:23
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Robert Stockwell on Thu, 01 November 2001 05:29
		Re: _Ref_Extra : BUG? (in Win2K 55b) corrected test file By: Martin Downing on Thu, 01 November 2001 09:00

Previous Topic:	Re: LINK : warning LNK4068: /MACHINE not specified; defaulting to IX86
Next Topic:	Re: texture_coord

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:10:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00468 seconds