comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL as programming language?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL as programming language? [message #2877 is a reply to message #2728] Mon, 05 September 1994 09:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
scisoft is currently offline  scisoft
Messages: 5
Registered: September 1994
Junior Member
William Thompson (thompson@orpheus.gsfc.nasa.gov) wrote:
: abz@waikato.ac.nz writes:
: >Speed. Some of us Grads are running some really time consuming programs
: >(large arrays, large loops). How does IDL compare with (say) FORTRAN in
: >general, speedwise? (my impression is that it's pretty slow, but I could
: >be wrong...)
: Loops are very slow. On the other hand, you usually can do it without
: loops in IDL. If you can't, there's always CALL_EXTERNAL or LINKIMAGE.

Another alternative is the IDL and PV-Wave interface to the optimized and
parallelized math library that our company sells. Dr. Thompson is
certainly correct that A=B*C is a faster matrix multiple than the
equivalent nested loops, but CALL GEMM(A,B,C) is about three times
faster than that even on a single-CPU box. On the multi-processors,
we're unbeatable.

scisoft@well.sf.ca.us for more information, end of plug.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: background jobs in IDL.....
Next Topic: Fitting curves

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:02:55 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.03888 seconds