comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Sacrilegious but genuine question

Home » Public Forums » archive » Sacrilegious but genuine question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question [message #28777 is a reply to message #28762]

Fri, 11 January 2002 11:43

Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000

Senior Member

If you have IDL, try it. There are a lot of array displaying routines
out there. And they are all open source (despite some being cleverly
disguised as .sav files :). So you can easily add your own functionality.

Cheers,
Pavel

P.S. David, for nothing better to do (I can't seem to make progress on
the paper I am supposed to write), I just wrote a direct graphics object
version of DISPLAY. You wouldn't believe that for all functionality of
DG (well, most frequently used, anyway) the code is just 150 lines!
Lets just say (tm) that after a peak of the code complexity on one's
learning curve there is that ditch where you get the same functionality
with much less code. I am trying to reach perfection now where all will
be done with 10 lines. What's the limit? No code at all and everything works?

Francis Burton wrote:
>
> Yes, but what I am looking for is very general! :-) I want something
> that allow very specific features to be added easily - both using an
> easy-to-understand scripting language that novice users can handle,
> and by providing a mechanism or framework that facilitates the addition
> of external modules (coded in the same language would be nice). What I
> personally =don't= want to have to do is develop the core system
> supporting this extensibility if someone has already done it.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Tue, 08 January 2002 08:26
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 11 January 2002 12:10
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Fri, 11 January 2002 12:01
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 11 January 2002 11:43
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Fri, 11 January 2002 09:19
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Fri, 11 January 2002 08:26
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Fri, 11 January 2002 07:31
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Fri, 11 January 2002 07:06
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Fri, 11 January 2002 06:18
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Fri, 11 January 2002 06:30
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 January 2002 13:07
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Thu, 10 January 2002 12:44
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 January 2002 12:25
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: Francis Burton on Thu, 10 January 2002 10:46
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 January 2002 07:59
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: James Kuyper on Thu, 10 January 2002 07:27
		Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 January 2002 06:01

Previous Topic:	RGB image to 8 bit ??
Next Topic:	Working with 2 partially overlapping images of different array sizes

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 02:55:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.92176 seconds