comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Object graphics under Linux: are they supposed to be that slow?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Object graphics under Linux: are they supposed to be that slow? [message #29043 is a reply to message #29032] Tue, 29 January 2002 08:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
nobody@nowhere.com (S is currently offline  nobody@nowhere.com (S
Messages: 55
Registered: July 2001
Member
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:55:49 +1300, Mark Hadfield <m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz> wrote:
> "Steve Smith<steven_smith>" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:slrna5be3l.qih.nobody@pooh.nrel.gov...
>> Hi Mark:
>> I'm not sure I've the answer for you, but I suspect that the big
> difference
>> is in the graphics subsystem, the windows more than likely supporting the
>> hardware acceleration and Linux (XFree I'm assuming) not....
>
> I have had email responses from a few people. They tell me that IDL 5.5 on
> Linux does not use the system's OpenGL drivers even if they are available.
> This is because in RSI's judgement the hardware support on Linux is (as you
> note) rather flaky. This is likely to change in future versions.
>
At least in previous versions of IDL (up to 5.2), I've heard that IDL uses
the hw-accel if it's available, but maybe that's changed. I always found the
idl demo Open GL stuff to be pretty snappy, but I've no 3-D apps. If you're
using XFree, I guess you should say XFree doesn't support hw-accel graphics
Open GL or DRI with the same scope as Windows, since XFree is not Linux (and
you don't have to use it, there are commercial Xservers that will support most
cards).
> I suspect that on my system the graphics driver is so crippled that hardware
> rendering would not help IDL much. It doesn't make much difference under
> Windows. Windows describes the graphics controller as an "Intel 810 Graphics
> Controller Hub" with 4MB memory. That doesn't sound like much video RAM,
> does it? However I believe the Intel 810 can access system RAM. Anyway, it's
> quite possible that performance would improve significantly if I reduced the
> screen resolution. I will look into this and report back to the group.
>

I would be suprised if it didn't improve at lower screen resolutions. I would
also look at the rest of the system and see that all your memory is being used,
that you don't have a lot of crap running that doesn't need to (RedHat installs
a lot of things you DO NOT need and usually don't want). The strong points of
Linux and other open source OS's is that you can build your system from the
ground up and you have control over everything. I didn't mean to say that any
thing about Linux per say was 'flaky'. As a windows user, I'm sure the word is
not foreign to you either (plenty of 'flaky' windows apps, subsystems). It is
just that graphics is not a traditional strong point of Unix, except in the
case of SGI, where they had complete control over the hardware and the
software.With PC's, only in the last few years have they had access to high
performance graphics systems, and MS-Windows has _conspired_ to have a similar
control over both hardware and software ends of the graphics subsystem, because
of the potential market for 3D gaming, for instance. Meanwhile, the open source
mostly volunteer XFree project has endeavored to try to incorporate much of the
rapidly changing hardware into X, sometimes by reverse engineering, a daunting
task do doubt. In the end, if you can get good hw-accelerated graphics on
a Linux box, it's by good fortune. You would have access to open source Open GL
toolkits and could probably do some pretty neat stuff with it, but for the
casual user this isn't useful.

>> I don't know what your reasons for moving to Linux were...
>

For me, it's in what they say: "... use the source, Luke!"

> I'm not sure myself! Better integration with other Unix systems mostly. I
> haven't really moved to Linux yet, just dipped my toe in the water and run
> back shivering. I haven't yet got my Linux setup to the stage where I can
> actually do productive work with it.
>
> ---
> Mark Hadfield
> m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz http://katipo.niwa.co.nz/~hadfield
> National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research
>
>
>


--
Steve S.

steve@NOSPAMmailaps.org
remove NOSPAM before replying
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Integration of a complex function
Next Topic: Re: Subject : locks, semaphores, and such

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:22:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56106 seconds