| Re: Naive pointer question ? [message #29054 is a reply to message #28944] |
Mon, 28 January 2002 16:00  |
Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
btupper@bigelow.org (Ben Tupper) writes:
> On 26 Jan 2002 15:16:17 -0600, Craig Markwardt
> <craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I appreciate that, however, common blocks appear to be the only way to
>> give a *function* persistent memory. If you use an object or a
>> pointer instead, you still have to pass this info into the function on
>> every call.
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Ah! I hadn't thought of that. Well, no objection here!
>
> Does it count if the object contains the function as a method?
Hmm, maybe. What are objects?
Craig
--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
