comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: AMD CPU - (pentium way faster)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: AMD CPU - (pentium way faster) [message #29092 is a reply to message #29087] Thu, 31 January 2002 12:39 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mark Hadfield is currently offline  Mark Hadfield
Messages: 783
Registered: May 1995
Senior Member
"Brian Jackel" <bjackel@phys.ucalgary.ca> wrote in message
news:3C5999AB.5DACDD1F@phys.ucalgary.ca...

> Why is Bob's Linux/Athlon combination so slow? Do RSI link to a
> particularly bad numerical library? I'd really like to know what's
> going on here. My long term plan is to migrate from Windows to
> Linux, but I'm not keen on a 50% degredation in effective processing
> power.

I have been comparing Linux & Windows 2000 on the same machine:
Pentium 3 800 MHz, 384 MB RAM. Linux wins the time_test2 comparison by
about 10 % (though Windows tries to cheat on the geometric mean by
recording a zero time for one of the tests).

However, as I reported in another thread, Linux is definitely slower
overall at object graphics, and 8 times (!) slower at a
surface-animation application that is fairly typical of my usage of
IDL. The reasons for this are still being investigated...

So, before you migrate, you should check it out for yourself. (But you
knew that didn't you?)

---
Mark Hadfield
m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz http://katipo.niwa.co.nz/~hadfield
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: why the output of PS and Screen arenot the same?
Next Topic: Object graphics under Linux: are they supposed to be that slow?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:44:07 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24314 seconds