comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Tick formatting
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Tick formatting [message #29152 is a reply to message #29144] Fri, 01 February 2002 14:54 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
gary.hodgesREMOVE is currently offline  gary.hodgesREMOVE
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2001
Junior Member
David Fanning <david@dfanning.com> wrote:
: Gary Hodges(gary.hodgesREMOVE@cires.colorado.edu) writes:

:> I have tricked IDL into producing the tick labels in the format I want by
:> changing the !X.TICKNAME to:
:>
:> !X.TICKNAME=['0','15','30','45','60','75','90','75','60','45 ','30','15','0']
:>
:> I'd still like to know the correct way.

: I'm not sure that is much of a trick. More like what
: the documentation called for, it seems to me. :-)

I saw that info a bit ago. I guess since it was almost working the first
way, I assumed the array was correctly constructed.

: But shouldn't !X.Ticks be 12 and not 13? Then you
: wouldn't have to use the !X.TickV variable at all,
: I think.

I saw that n and n+1 stuff... OK, I'm looking at it again and it is tick
_intervals_. I think I still need TICKV since I want the first tick at 0,
not -5. How would it know to start there otherwise?

Gary
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Color text within WIDGET_TEXT?
Next Topic: Double-precision plotting doesn't work in object graphics

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 20:05:29 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01127 seconds