comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: AMD CPU - pentium way faster? (should be IDL on win2000 faster than IDL on linux)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: AMD CPU - pentium way faster? (should be IDL on win2000 faster than IDL on linux) [message #29170 is a reply to message #29085] Fri, 01 February 2002 06:23 Go to previous message
Robert Stockwell is currently offline  Robert Stockwell
Messages: 74
Registered: October 2001
Member
Mark Hadfield wrote:

> "Robert Stockwell" <rgs1967@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3C59AAA6.4040802@hotmail.com...
>
>> Average time for time_test.pro = ...
>>
>
> Isn't time_test deprecated these days in favour of time_test2? (The reason
> being, I believe, that the tests in the former are too small to be
> meaningful.) Time_test2 is the only one mentioned in the help file.



I did both sets of tests. Same results. I only mentioned
the time_test ones because I am lazy.


> There's
> also a time_test3 that seems to be the same as time_test2 except that some
> tests have been increased in size. JD's IDLSPEC2 benchmark uses time_test3
> so perhaps we should standardise on this.


Sure, I'll find that and get the results.

Cheers,
bob



> ---
> Mark Hadfield
> m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz http://katipo.niwa.co.nz/~hadfield
> National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research
>
>
>
>
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: representive digits
Next Topic: test

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 22:28:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15823 seconds