comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Endian-ness

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Endian-ness [message #29305 is a reply to message #29236]

Mon, 11 February 2002 08:12

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

Jonathan Joseph wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Am I correct in assuming that Liam's functions don't need to be
> specifically cast to Long? In other words,
>
> byte(1,0) would yield the same result as byte(1L, 0L)

That's just my FORTRAN background showing: I prefer to use explicit
casts.

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Endian-ness By: Jonathan Joseph on Fri, 08 February 2002 12:47
		Re: Endian-ness By: Robert Stockwell on Mon, 11 February 2002 10:01
		Re: Endian-ness By: Liam E. Gumley on Mon, 11 February 2002 08:12

Previous Topic:	IDL5.5 online help
Next Topic:	Tessellate Question--fewest convex polys

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 21:20:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.00031 seconds