comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » idl2matlab translate-o-matic

Home » Public Forums » archive » idl2matlab translate-o-matic

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL2MATLAB [message #29473 is a reply to message #19024]

Tue, 26 February 2002 11:18

gutmann
Messages: 11
Registered: December 2001

Junior Member

notspecified@dev.null (Matt Feinstein) wrote in message news:<3c7b8f32.5448103@aplnews>...
> On 26 Feb 2002 05:02:19 -0800, the_cacc@hotmail.com (trouble) wrote:
>
> translation would be pretty trivial (except, I guess, for
> vectorization).

actually, matlab has a fairly similar vector processing
implementation, I wouldn't be surprised if the vector/array ops are
trivial it would just be hard to interpret every single IDL function
call into the comparable matlab function call. some of these would
be trivial, some of them would be very difficult. I would imagine a
translator that will convert ~90% of IDL code to matlab code would be
trivial, ~9% would be hard, and maybe 1% would be next to impossible.

ethan

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Ken Mankoff on Sun, 20 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Mark D. Williams on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Mike Schienle on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: davidf on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: thompson on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Mirko Vukovic on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: pit on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: wbiagiot on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: David McClain on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: David McClain on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: T Bowers on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: davidf on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Mirko Vukovic on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Craig Markwardt on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: John-David T. Smith on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Craig Markwardt on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Pavel Romashkin on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: davidf on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Pavel Romashkin on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: John-David T. Smith on Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: davidf on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: John-David T. Smith on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic By: John Pezaris on Fri, 25 February 2000 00:00
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: Liam E. Gumley on Tue, 26 February 2002 12:04
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: Nigel Wade on Wed, 27 February 2002 02:13
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: gutmann on Tue, 26 February 2002 11:18
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: notspecified on Tue, 26 February 2002 08:35
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: James Kuyper on Tue, 26 February 2002 07:41
		Re: IDL2MATLAB By: notspecified on Tue, 26 February 2002 05:40

Previous Topic:	running different IDL versions simultaneously
Next Topic:	voxel_proj and seg fault

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:34:45 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00496 seconds