comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: LINUX version of IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: LINUX version of IDL [message #2979 is a reply to message #2804] Sun, 16 October 1994 03:44 Go to previous message
miff is currently offline  miff
Messages: 2
Registered: October 1994
Junior Member
First things first : This is _not_ meant to be an operating system flame.
I aim to 1) support the original poster's intentions, and 2) correct
some of his obvious errors.

larkum@optolab.unibe.ch (Matthew Larkum) writes:

>> I'm interseted in persuading RSI to support IDL under LINUX. LINUX
>> is the free, GNU-like version of UNIX for use on Intel-486 based machines (i.e.
>> DOS machines). Our experience with LINUX has been terrific. It is a complete
>> implemtation of BSD-Unix which turns a $2000 PC into a Unix workstation as
>> powerful and functional as any $10,000+ workstation (SUN,SGI,IBM,...)

Bear in mind that Linux is _not_ an implementation of BSD unix.

FreeBSD and NetBSD are BSD implementations. Linux is a unix-like operating
system originally developed by Linus Torvalds. All are freely available,
and perform wonderfully on low-priced hardware.

>> The only thing lacking for us is a binary of IDL which will run under LINUX.

Binaries for a number of operating systems would be nice. There are those
of us who would like to run IDL in extremely harsh environments, where
ruggedised PC hardware has a significant price advantage, and a high-
-reliability PC unix like FreeBSD would be preferable to, say, Intel Solaris
or Linux.

The PC BSD's and Linux share a very similar programming model, and a clean
port to any one would make a port to the others extremely trivial. Given
the low cost of hardware, this would potentially produce a sigificant
market slice for RSI.

The only question I would ask is, would your departmental head be willing
to support any of the free Intel unices?

--
# mike smith : miff@apanix.apana.org.au - Silicon grease monkey #
# "The question 'why are the fundamental laws of nature mathematical' #
# then invites the trivial response 'because we define as fundamental #
# those laws which are mathematical'". Paul Davies, _The_Mind_of_God_. #
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: gridding large amounts of data
Next Topic: Streamlines with IDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 01:13:41 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.51870 seconds