comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Object Programming in IDL

Home » Public Forums » archive » Object Programming in IDL

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Object Programming in IDL [message #30946 is a reply to message #30832]

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:14

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

"Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> writes:
>>
>> Ahh, don't worry Graham, I don't normally read object postings :-)
>
> This reminds me of one posting I read in comp.object, a group for
> discussions of O-O issues in any language. During a rather intense argument
> among people with very strong opinions, someone pointed out that in the name
> of the newsgroup, "object" was the noun, not the verb.
>
> Which did you mean, Craig? :-)

Heh, I like the ambiguity. :-)

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Object Programming in IDL By: graham_wilson_1234 on Tue, 21 May 2002 05:26
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: R.Bauer on Fri, 24 May 2002 01:53
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Fri, 24 May 2002 04:59
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 23 May 2002 19:52
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: Dick Jackson on Fri, 24 May 2002 07:51
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: K. Bowman on Thu, 23 May 2002 14:00
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Thu, 23 May 2002 08:47
		Re: Object Programming in IDL By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 24 May 2002 11:14

Previous Topic:	url_get and idl -rt
Next Topic:	a question about ENVI menu and source file

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 20:27:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.52088 seconds