comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: GET

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: GET_LUN running out of LUNs?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: GET_LUN running out of LUNs? [message #31120 is a reply to message #31113]

Wed, 12 June 2002 16:50

Ken Mankoff
Messages: 158
Registered: February 2000

Senior Member

> CLOSE, unit, /PLEASE ?

You should use FREE_LUN.

I think (not sure) that:

CLOSE is used on LUNs below 100. These LUNs are usually hardcoded. ex:
IDL> OPENR, 42, 'foo'
IDL> CLOSE, 42

FREE_LUN is used on LUNs from 100 to 128. These LUNs are dynamically
allocated via the GET_LUN procedure or keyword. ex:
IDL> OPENR, lun, 'foo', /GET
IDL> FREE_LUN, lun

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: GET_LUN running out of LUNs? By: Niel Malan on Thu, 13 June 2002 04:13
		Re: GET_LUN running out of LUNs? By: Ken Mankoff on Wed, 12 June 2002 16:50

Previous Topic:	Active X
Next Topic:	OPI function wave_execute fails on VMS

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 05:49:54 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87995 seconds