comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » REGRESS Question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: REGRESS Question [message #32061 is a reply to message #31982] Thu, 05 September 2002 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
William Clodius is currently offline  William Clodius
Messages: 30
Registered: December 1996
Member
David Fanning wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I have a client who has asked me to create a pixel density
> function between two images and then perform a regression
> analysis on the resulting distribution. No problem doing all
> this, but she finds that the results of my regression analysis
> differ from the same analysis performed in other statistics
> packages. In fact, three different packages give the same
> answer, and then there is IDL. :-(
>
> For example, if the other packages calculate a "goodness
> of fit" of 0.95, IDL might report 0.97.
>
> Here is my question. Are there any known problems with REGRESS?
> Or, can I assume that this problem comes from my own mathematical
> ignorance?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

<snip>

Almost any package can have problems, but the original REGRESS in
Bevington has stood the test of time. IDL's version works for me, but it
is possible that the introduced some problems. One thing that bothers
me is tha 0.95 is to a good approximation 0.97^2. Could you be fitting
the square root of the customer's data.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL Programming Techniques, 3rd edition
Next Topic: Reading fortran

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 04:41:28 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.61180 seconds