comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Convolution, IDL & Numerical Recipes
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Convolution, IDL & Numerical Recipes [message #32675 is a reply to message #32672] Thu, 31 October 2002 17:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
James Kuyper is currently offline  James Kuyper
Messages: 425
Registered: March 2000
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:
...
> Gonzales and Woods seem to suggest that "convolution" is a
> frequency domain concept, and can only be loosely applied in
> the linear spatial sense. Could this be part of the problem?

The convolution isn't specifically a frequency-domain concept. In fact,
as I'm usually seen it, the canonical definition is in the time domain.
cgh(t) is the convolution of g(t) and h(t) if:

cgh(t) = integral(g(tau)h(t-tau) d tau)

The importance of the frequency domain for convolutions is that it can
be proven that if G(f), H(f), and CGH(f) are the fourier transforms of
g(t), h(t), and cfg(t) respectively, then:

CGH(f) = G(f)*H(f)

If they'd been thinking in the frequency domain, there's no way they'd
have named it using a word that is closely related to "convoluted".
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL --> C++ ?
Next Topic: About file length

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 07:33:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.84095 seconds