comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Home » Public Forums » archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? [message #33167 is a reply to message #33069]

Fri, 06 December 2002 15:08

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Sean Raffuse (sean@me.wustl.edu) writes:

> I have a routine that is slooooow. I would like to try and speed it up, but
> I don't know where to focus my efforts because I don't know what part of the
> process is taking all the time. So, is there a way to see how long each
> section takes? I tried using systime at the beginning of each section, but
> it only has resolution in seconds! If it matters, I'm on a Windows system.

I think what you want is the PROFILER command.
That will show you what is taking all the time.

Cheers,

David
--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		anything more accurate than systime() ? By: Sean Raffuse on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:42
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: David Fanning on Fri, 06 December 2002 15:08
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: R.G. Stockwell on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:51

Previous Topic:	Re: New user - can't get Meta-tab to work on OS X
Next Topic:	Re: Issues with IDL 5.6 OS X and OroborOSX-v0.8 beta 2

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:51:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00431 seconds