comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Home » Public Forums » archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? [message #33168 is a reply to message #33069]

Fri, 06 December 2002 14:51

R.G. Stockwell
Messages: 363
Registered: July 1999

Senior Member

windows machines don't have high precession (or at least they
didn't use to). I doubt you can get past 10ms.

I suggest taking the components and looping a few thousand times.

Cheers,
bob

Sean Raffuse wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a routine that is slooooow. I would like to try and speed it up, but
> I don't know where to focus my efforts because I don't know what part of the
> process is taking all the time. So, is there a way to see how long each
> section takes? I tried using systime at the beginning of each section, but
> it only has resolution in seconds! If it matters, I'm on a Windows system.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sean
>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		anything more accurate than systime() ? By: Sean Raffuse on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:42
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: David Fanning on Fri, 06 December 2002 15:08
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: R.G. Stockwell on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:51

Previous Topic:	Re: New user - can't get Meta-tab to work on OS X
Next Topic:	Re: Issues with IDL 5.6 OS X and OroborOSX-v0.8 beta 2

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:41:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00406 seconds