comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: simple array math question

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: simple array math question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: simple array math question [message #33796 is a reply to message #33738]

Sun, 26 January 2003 11:25

Heinz Stege
Messages: 189
Registered: January 2003

Senior Member

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:53:33 -0700, JD Smith <jdsmith@as.arizona.edu>
wrote:

<snip>
>
> OK, I've performed some speed tests comparing the two methods:
>
<snip>
>
> JD

Thanks a lot for this very instructive contribution! Since the
proposal of the intarr() method was from me, the NG may allow me to
state this here.

REBIN(REFORM(...)) is the better alternative. This is obvious now.

Heinz

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: simple array math question By: marc schellens[1] on Sun, 19 January 2003 22:55
		Re: simple array math question By: Jeff Guerber on Fri, 17 January 2003 20:21
		Re: simple array math question By: Heinz Stege on Fri, 17 January 2003 16:51
		Re: simple array math question By: Sean Raffuse on Fri, 17 January 2003 14:10
		Re: simple array math question By: JD Smith on Fri, 17 January 2003 13:46
		Re: simple array math question By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 16 January 2003 19:47
		Re: simple array math question By: Heinz Stege on Thu, 16 January 2003 16:26
		Re: simple array math question By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 16 January 2003 13:30
		Re: simple array math question By: Pepijn Kenter on Fri, 24 January 2003 04:43
		Re: simple array math question By: JD Smith on Thu, 23 January 2003 08:53
		Re: simple array math question By: Heinz Stege on Sun, 26 January 2003 11:25
		Re: simple array math question By: Jeff Guerber on Sat, 25 January 2003 01:12

Previous Topic:	MOUSE (WHEEL) BUTTON NON-STOP SCROLLING IN IDL 5.6
Next Topic:	Re: Windows XP graphics problem

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:26:25 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00450 seconds