comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 [message #34308 is a reply to message #34266] Fri, 28 February 2003 12:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
JD Smith (jdsmith@as.arizona.edu) writes:

> Which is when _STRICT_EXTRA was first introduced. Coincidence?
>
> My consipiracy theory: RSI switched from checking built-in system routine
> keywords at compile to run-time with v5.5. This isn't the first time
> they've done this type of thing: around v5.3, they switched from checking
> the validity of system variables at compile time to run time (which was
> rather convenient, actually).

Alright, another case closed by the ace detectives
at the IEPA agency. I'll write a report, sir.

Cheers,

David

P.S. There is a new wrapper program on my web page
that uses only a singe EXECUTE statement. :-)

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: 2 questions about .sav files
Next Topic: Re: writing ascii files (with really long lines...)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 09:57:07 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68186 seconds