comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 [message #34310 is a reply to message #34222]

Fri, 28 February 2003 12:15

thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991

Senior Member

David Fanning <david@dfanning.com> writes:

(stuff deleted)

> I think there must have been a change somewhere along
> the way (while we are on this subject). Because I didn't
> expect that file to compile in IDL 5.4, due to the REAL_PART
> function in the IDL 5.5 part of the CASE statement. When it
> did, that's when I realized I needed a nap.

Sure it compiled. Even REAL_PART isn't a built-in function in IDL 5.4, the
compiler just assumes there's going to be a real_part.pro procedure somewhere,
but it won't look for that until runtime.

Hope you had a good nap, ;^)

Bill Thompson

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: JD Smith on Fri, 28 February 2003 09:52
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: David Fanning on Fri, 28 February 2003 09:47
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Pavel Romashkin on Fri, 28 February 2003 09:25
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: notspecified on Fri, 28 February 2003 07:04
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: R.G. Stockwell on Fri, 28 February 2003 05:59
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 27 February 2003 23:42
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Alexander Rauscher on Thu, 27 February 2003 22:52
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: notspecified on Thu, 27 February 2003 12:03
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: David Fanning on Thu, 27 February 2003 11:17
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Mark Hadfield on Thu, 27 February 2003 11:00
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Richard Younger on Thu, 27 February 2003 10:41
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: R.G. Stockwell on Thu, 27 February 2003 09:53
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: David Fanning on Thu, 27 February 2003 08:07
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Alexander Rauscher on Thu, 27 February 2003 07:56
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: thompson on Thu, 27 February 2003 07:58
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 27 February 2003 07:38
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: James Kuyper on Thu, 27 February 2003 07:12
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: R.G. Stockwell on Thu, 27 February 2003 07:13
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: David Fanning on Thu, 27 February 2003 05:20
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: thompson on Fri, 28 February 2003 12:12
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: David Fanning on Fri, 28 February 2003 11:42
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: thompson on Fri, 28 February 2003 12:15
		Re: no backwards compatibility in IDL 5.6 By: Pavel Romashkin on Fri, 28 February 2003 09:55

Previous Topic:	Re: The continuing saga of WHERE and 2D
Next Topic:	Re: labeling my polarplot

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:15:21 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00312 seconds