comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34467 is a reply to message #34374] Wed, 12 March 2003 13:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Rick Towler is currently offline  Rick Towler
Messages: 821
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
"Liam Gumley" wrote ...
> "Dick Jackson" wrote in message
>> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as his
>> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
>> solved as follows:
>>
>> =====
>> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that limits
>> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
>> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL that
>> were 20MB each.
>> =====
>
> Dick,
>
> Can you give us any more details about the version of Windows, and the
> method used to disable terminal services? I've also had problems creating
> large pixmaps...

The terminal services server is not installed on Win2k Pro and XP. The
client can be but I don't think that would interfere with IDL. Terminal
services are installed by default (?) on Win2k Server and Advanced Server.
I don't know about NT4. They can be removed by using the install cd.

-Rick
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Pointer Help - Referencing/Dereferencing in Functions & Procedures
Next Topic: Converting call externals from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 23:02:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64193 seconds