comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34468 is a reply to message #34387]

Wed, 12 March 2003 13:39

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

"Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> wrote in message
news:11uba.198256$na.6887526@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> Hi,
>
> In case anyone else might find this useful...
>
> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as his
> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
> solved as follows:
>
> =====
> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that limits
> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL that
> were 20MB each.
> =====

Dick is having some news server trouble, and some people aren't seeing his
postings at all. If you can read this, but not any postings from him (like
the two in this thread), please write him at dick@d-jackson.com with your
news server address, to help him get this sorted out.

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Dick Jackson on Tue, 11 March 2003 15:09
		Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 12 March 2003 13:39

Previous Topic:	Re: rs_test.pro
Next Topic:	SPECIII?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:29:34 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40067 seconds