comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » output

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: output [message #34513 is a reply to message #34430]

Tue, 18 March 2003 17:24

tomson
Messages: 39
Registered: March 2003

Member

I am very sorry for that. This is my setting:

device,filename='plot.eps',bits=8,/color ,/ENCAPSUL
DEVICE, SET_FONT='times',/tt_font
!p.font=1
OR
device,filename='plot.cgm',colors=2^8,/bin
(I cannot use set_font??)
OR
device,filename='plot.wmf',/index_COLOR

Are there anything wrong?

"David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> д��Ϣ��
:MPG.18e1711ff3367d51989b21@news.frii.com...
> tomson (tom2959@21cn.com) writes:
>
>> I can insert EPS into word and it looks good on the screen. When I
print
>> the file, it looks not so good as file by inserting WMF or CGM(vector
form)
>> figure. So I always convert PS to WMF. But sometimes the converted
figure
>> is not the same as original one. I am puzzled.
>
> *You* are puzzled!? You certainly have me scratching
> my head.
>
> I don't mean any disrespect, but I simply don't believe
> you. :-)
>
> I'm going to suggest that if your PostScript output
> looks worse when it is printed than it does when it's
> on the display, then the PostScript file hasn't been
> created properly. In fact, I'm going to suggest there
> is about a 90% chance that it is a screenshot (an image),
> and NOT real PostScript output, which would be vector
> output similar to your beloved CGM.
>
> Perhaps if we could have a peek at the code you
> use to produce this PostScript output. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		output By: tomson on Mon, 17 March 2003 19:47
		Re: output By: MKatz843 on Thu, 20 March 2003 09:55
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:47
		Re: output By: Pavel Romashkin on Thu, 20 March 2003 09:45
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:37
		Re: output By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 19 March 2003 17:27
		Re: output By: Chad Bender on Wed, 19 March 2003 16:13
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:30
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Wed, 19 March 2003 15:38
		Re: output By: tomson on Wed, 19 March 2003 00:12
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 20:52
		Re: output By: Mark Hadfield on Tue, 18 March 2003 20:40
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:36
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:19
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:12
		Re: output By: Chad Bender on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:05
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:06
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:01
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:59
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:26
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:24
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:09
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 11:45

Previous Topic:	IDL 5.6 PostScript B&W output is gray
Next Topic:	"broken" scale in IDL plot

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 09:09:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.60110 seconds