comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL 6.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 6.0 [message #34591 is a reply to message #34528]

Mon, 31 March 2003 07:50

mmiller3
Messages: 81
Registered: January 2002

Member

>>>> > "JD" == JD Smith <jdsmith@as.arizona.edu> writes:

> The problem is the IDL startup time is long enough that
> interactive use is stressed much more than batch use.
> I.e. the standard response would be that you should string
> together your bits of code in an *IDL*
> script/batch-file/$MAIN$-level-routine.

IDL starts in about 3 seconds or less on the machine I just timed
it on (2 GHz pentiums). The jobs we're regularly running take
from 5-500 minutes, so start up time is negligible.

Mike

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL 6.0 By: jlhall on Thu, 27 March 2003 10:04
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: JD Smith on Mon, 31 March 2003 08:23
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: mmiller3 on Mon, 31 March 2003 07:50
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: wmconnolley on Sun, 30 March 2003 13:54
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: David Fanning on Sat, 29 March 2003 17:08
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: wmconnolley on Sat, 29 March 2003 12:31
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: David Fanning on Sat, 29 March 2003 06:32
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: wmconnolley on Sat, 29 March 2003 06:14
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: MC on Fri, 28 March 2003 16:38
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: JD Smith on Fri, 28 March 2003 08:59
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: mmiller3 on Fri, 28 March 2003 07:51
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: mmiller3 on Fri, 28 March 2003 07:28
		Re: IDL 6.0 By: Randall Skelton on Fri, 28 March 2003 01:47

Previous Topic:	Re: "broken" scale in IDL plot
Next Topic:	Re: PV Wave vs IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:59:24 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00543 seconds