comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Interactive Objects, Was: Simple GUI question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Interactive Objects, Was: Simple GUI question [message #34909 is a reply to message #34789] Fri, 25 April 2003 12:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mvukovic is currently offline  mvukovic
Messages: 63
Registered: July 1998
Member
Paul van Delst <paul.vandelst@noaa.gov> wrote in message news:<3EA93481.88D1DE12@noaa.gov>...
> MC wrote:
>>
>> My wish list:
>>
>> 1) Whatever is availale in object graphics is also made available in direct
>> graphics. And leave the choice of style to the individual.
>
> <RANT>
> Hmm. When I use IDL it's typically to look at data. That pretty much it. You know the
> usual stuff, plot, surface, contour, etc. And once I have the first plot up, I want to do
> things like change the scales (e.g. zoom), or rotate the surfaces - you know, play around
> with the numbers. I realised after a bit of a rant the other day that I don't really care
> *how* the images are created/displayed onscreen, I just want them to appear, and I want to
> be able to manipulate them.
>
> Why can't the mechanism behind someone type PLOT on the IDL command line be totally
> transparent? When I plot something I certainly don't care if it was done via direct or
> object graphics, I just want to see the darn plot.
>
> So, I have to admit it sort of confuses me that RSI introduced all this whiz bang object
> graphics stuff, but no "value-added" tools that use them. It's almost like buying a
> mecchano (sp?) set - you get all the structural members and nuts and bolts and tools, but
> if you want anything interesting to play with ya gotta build it yourself. I don't want to
> write a whole bunch of code to do plots, surfaces, contours, whatever in object graphics
> so I can utilise their superior capabilities - that's what we pay so much moola for in the
> first place isn't it?
> </RANT>
>
> Off for more coffee....
>
> paulv

You could use ``live'' tools. I tried, and never liked them very
much. The design, interface, and looks just struck me as clunky. But
then again, maybe I did not give them enough of a chance.

Mirko
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: grROI Style and anROI Type
Next Topic: Re: xcontour and ticks

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:43:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00367 seconds