comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: axis problem

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: axis problem [message #35781 is a reply to message #35780]

Sat, 19 July 2003 11:44

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Reimar Bauer writes:

> I am not sure if this is a bug.
>
> If I use axis with _extra xticks=0 the idl automatic is used to draw quite
> good major ticks.
> But if I use axis with _extra (xticks=4,xminor=0) the major ticks are the
> same as the other example but no automatic for minor ticks.
> The same result gives axis with _extra (xticks=4,xminor=1)

I don't thing this is a bug. The documentation describes
the MINOR keyword as the number of minor tick *intervals*,
not tick marks. I wouldn't expect any visual difference between
an axis with 0 minor tick intervals and 1 minor tick interval
between major tick marks. They should look exactly the same,
as they do in this example.

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: axis problem By: David Fanning on Mon, 21 July 2003 08:57
		Re: axis problem By: JD Smith on Mon, 21 July 2003 08:25
		Re: axis problem By: R.Bauer on Sun, 20 July 2003 13:42
		Re: axis problem By: David Fanning on Sun, 20 July 2003 10:08
		Re: axis problem By: R.Bauer on Sun, 20 July 2003 09:23
		Re: axis problem By: David Fanning on Sun, 20 July 2003 08:26
		Re: axis problem By: R.Bauer on Sun, 20 July 2003 00:52
		Re: axis problem By: David Fanning on Sat, 19 July 2003 11:44
		Re: axis problem By: R.Bauer on Wed, 23 July 2003 09:06

Previous Topic:	Thank you all for helps,
Next Topic:	Leading zeros in Format

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 02:05:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.55848 seconds