comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Who's up for breaking IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Who's up for breaking IDL? [message #36013 is a reply to message #35824] Mon, 04 August 2003 08:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
Tim Robishaw wrote:
>
> Oh, wait. Now it does. Yeah. I'm confused. What this suggests to me
> is that you cannot have a file that stores a routine and name it with
> capital letters. (I could call the actual routine name, inside the
> file, PRO ReSoLvE_Me... this isn't a case sensitive issue... it's all
> about how I choose to name the file.) Otherwise, RESOLVE_ROUTINE will
> choke on it if the routine has not already been compiled. That is
> dumb. Someone please tell me that I'm right???

Yep - you're right. Filenames should always be lowercase (on unix systems at
least...dunno about windows.)

It is a bit nutty, I agree, but that's the way it is. I think case sensitivity
in any language is silly. I don't know how C programmers can stand it.

paulv

--
Paul van Delst
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP/EMC
Ph: (301)763-8000 x7748
Fax:(301)763-8545
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Who's up for breaking IDL?
Next Topic: Importing data to iTool Data manager from the command line

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:20:43 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00447 seconds