comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Who's up for breaking IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Who's up for breaking IDL? [message #36018 is a reply to message #35820] Mon, 04 August 2003 05:44 Go to previous message
R.G. Stockwell is currently offline  R.G. Stockwell
Messages: 363
Registered: July 1999
Senior Member
"David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1996c178820129639896c3@news.frii.com...
> Tim Robishaw writes:
>
>> But am I right? Isn't this dumb? I
>> mean, what a bug!
>
> I guess you could argue whether it is dumb or not,
> although in 1956 (or whenever the choice was made)
> the idea of mixed characters in file names was
> certainly wacko. In fact, it was probably those
> commie pinko liberals at Apple who thought it up.
>
> But there is no way in the world it is a "bug"! :-)


I'm probably taking my life in my hands, but I'm gonna say its a bug.
If the operating system allows case sensitive filenames, then IDL should
be able to work with them. I view the "never use captials" in the same
way I would view " never use the letter m in a filename".
(assuming the OPs description is correct. This "bug" does not exist on my
win2000 idl 6.0, i haven't bothered to check it out on linux.)

Having said that, i do agree that is insane to have case sensitive
filenames.
I do use legacy c code on the *nix platforms that take advantage of
the liberal use of capitals, drives me freakin crazy.

Cheers,
bob
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Searching PDF help in IDL 5.6
Next Topic: Who's up for breaking IDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 08:13:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 7.83899 seconds