comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » idlde: Linux vs. Windows
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: idlde: Linux vs. Windows [message #36415 is a reply to message #36327] Wed, 10 September 2003 07:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Liam Gumley is currently offline  Liam Gumley
Messages: 473
Registered: November 1994
Senior Member
"Chris ODell" <odell@aos.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:2fafbdc3.0309091504.88fa86e@posting.google.com...
> I have just switched jobs, and in the process have been forced to
> migrate from Windows to Linux. I have a lot of programming in the
> windows IDLDE and really love it. Color coding, lots of preferences
> available (like getting the silly project manager off the desktop),
> etc. I see (in previous threads) that there are some weird technical
> reasons why idlde in Linux totally bites.
>
> So tell me, what is an idl programmer in linux to do? What do you
> guys do (I'm thinking of Craig Marquardt, Liam Gumley, David Fanning,
> etc)? All use
> emacs plus the simple idl command line interface? Or something else?
>
> I realize I am new to programming IDL under linux, so I am figuring
> people out there have come up with a nice system (equal in
> functionality to the windows idlde i hope!) for linux idl
> programming/debugging/running. Just curious what it is.

For me on UNIX, it's nedit in one window, and the IDL command line in
another window:

http://www.nedit.org/features.shtml/

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL 6.0 on a G5
Next Topic: Re: raster to vector conversion

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 22:09:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80475 seconds