comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: What does an optimal scientific programming language/environment need?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: What does an optimal scientific programming language/environment need? [message #36501 is a reply to message #36500] Mon, 22 September 2003 11:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Duane Bozarth is currently offline  Duane Bozarth
Messages: 4
Registered: September 2003
Junior Member
Richard Maine wrote:
>
> Duane Bozarth <dp_bozarth@swko.dot.net> writes:
>
>> Well, since F77 there is little that has actually been removed and a
>> major consideration (as is evidenced in converstions in c.l.f) is
>> maintaining compatability w/existing code. In practice, virtually
>> nothing is ever removed from a commercial compiler although most have
>> switches to allow specific standard level violations to be flagged...
>
> Note that the "since f77" applies to the whole paragraph. Whether
> you intended it to or not, I'm unsure; but it needs to.

Yes, I <did> intend that--hopefully it wasn't <too> unclear, but
undoubtedly wise to comment/amplify...

I was, admittedly, making an implicit assumption that there really are
few pre-F77 compilers around, which is, not <necessarily> globally true,
but for a new language on what was specified to be for "Wintel/Lintel"
only platforms figured that wouldn't be a stretch.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: raster to vector conversion
Next Topic: Specifying file for PRINTER output

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:00:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.52193 seconds