| Re: What does an optimal scientific programming language/environment need? [message #36513 is a reply to message #36507] |
Sun, 21 September 2003 14:46   |
Gary L. Scott
Messages: 3
Registered: September 2003
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Ken Plotkin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:29:12 +0100, John Sullivan
> <spamtrap@yddraiggoch.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> If you follow the link to the 920 programming languages on page
>> http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/contents/language.html
>> you will see that at least 5 languages are missing:
>> A, A+, J, K, Q-Nial
>
> Make that at least six. I don't see COMAL listed, either.
Well, I've written several "macro processors". That's a pseudo
interpreter I would guess. Does that count or only those that were
borne of academia? Including those, I would guess there may be many
thousands of "languages".
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@ev1.net
Fortran Library
http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the GNU Fortran G95 Project: http://g95.sourceforge.net
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
