| Re: What does an optimal scientific programming language/environment need? [message #36514 is a reply to message #36427] |
Sun, 21 September 2003 12:56   |
phil chastney
Messages: 5
Registered: September 2003
|
Junior Member |
|
|
"R.G. Stockwell" <noemail@please.com> wrote in message
news:hQmbb.33$Rk2.40033@news.uswest.net...
>
> "John Sullivan" <spamtrap@yddraiggoch.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:G8SUNoRYHdb$EAf2@yddraiggoch.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <Dbjbb.20886$Od.764849@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, David Frank
>> If you follow the link to the 920 programming languages on page
>> http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/contents/language.html
>> you will see that at least 5 languages are missing:
>> A, A+, J, K, Q-Nial
>
> Also missing are IDL, PVWAVE, and MATLAB, which lack of mention
> seems odd since those are the newsgroups to which this message is
> crossposted.
SIMPL is also missing, which is a favourite of mine because it has been used 5
or 6 times, for completely different languages (which are not to be confused
with the current Linux initiative)
actually, I think I could name a couple of dozen other omissions . . . /phil
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
