| Re: What does an optimal scientific programming language/environment need? [message #36517 is a reply to message #36419] |
Sun, 21 September 2003 09:29   |
John Sullivan
Messages: 1
Registered: September 2003
|
Junior Member |
|
|
In message <Dbjbb.20886$Od.764849@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, David Frank
<dave_frank@hotmail.com> writes
>
> "grunes" <grunes@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:2c0d6c85.0309191029.3efe3a99@posting.google.com...
>> I'm working on creating an optimal scientific programming language
> and
>> environment. My hope is that people who use current environments
> have
>> specific things they love about it, that need to be included. For
> now
>> I'm trying to combine the best concepts from FORTRAN, BASIC, C, APL,
>> IDL, PV-WAVE, and possibly MATLAB.
>>
>
> Hmmm, yours would be programming language #921 according to below:
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11651http://www.theinqui rer.net/?art
> icle=11651
>
>
If you follow the link to the 920 programming languages on page
http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/contents/language.html
you will see that at least 5 languages are missing:
A, A+, J, K, Q-Nial
--
John Sullivan
Please note that any disclaimer on email to me does not
apply, because I have not agreed with it. If your lawyers
disagree, please ask them to study the law of contract.
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
