comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 [message #36570 is a reply to message #36569]

Wed, 08 October 2003 02:04

marc schellens[1]
Messages: 183
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

Graham wrote:
> Marc Schellens <m_schellens@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3F827F34.9010207@hotmail.com>...
>
>> in 5.4:
>>
>> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
>> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
>> false
>>
>> in 6.0:
>>
>> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
>> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
>> true
>>
>> potentially dangerous, isn't it?
>
>
> Seriously, you don't use IDL for complex numbers do you?

No.
I was just playing with 6.0

But why are you so sure about this?
I always thought that other people well use complex numbers.
Are there some reasons why nobody should use IDL with complex numbers?
Anybody out there using complex numbers in IDL?

marc

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:16
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:04
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:50
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: GrahamWilsonCA on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:19
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 09 October 2003 15:12
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Thu, 09 October 2003 05:18

Previous Topic:	Re: javascript variable in ionscript
Next Topic:	Re: UNIQ and structure arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 11:54:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36176 seconds